Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Unfractionated heparin is often used as adjunctive therapy with fibrinolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We compared a low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, with unfractionated heparin for this purpose. METHODS We randomly assigned 20,506 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who were scheduled to undergo fibrinolysis to receive enoxaparin throughout the index hospitalization or weight-based unfractionated heparin for at least 48 hours. The primary efficacy end point was death or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction through 30 days. RESULTS The primary end point occurred in 12.0 percent of patients in the unfractionated heparin group and 9.9 percent of those in the enoxaparin group (17 percent reduction in relative risk, P<0.001). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 4.5 percent of the patients receiving unfractionated heparin and 3.0 percent of those receiving enoxaparin (33 percent reduction in relative risk, P<0.001); 7.5 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin died, as did 6.9 percent of those given enoxaparin (P=0.11). The composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or urgent revascularization occurred in 14.5 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin and 11.7 percent of those given enoxaparin (P<0.001); major bleeding occurred in 1.4 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). The composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage (a measure of net clinical benefit) occurred in 12.2 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin and 10.1 percent of those given enoxaparin (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, treatment with enoxaparin throughout the index hospitalization is superior to treatment with unfractionated heparin for 48 hours but is associated with an increase in major bleeding episodes. These findings should be interpreted in the context of net clinical benefit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00077792.).
منابع مشابه
Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as adjunctive therapy to fibrinolysis in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.
CRD summary This review assessed the effect of using enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, as an additional therapy with fibrinolytic treatment (such as streptokinase) in people with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. The authors concluded that enoxaparin was more effective than unfractionated heparin. However, the rates of major bleeding when using enoxaparin were signific...
متن کاملOutcomes and optimal antithrombotic therapy in women undergoing fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND The manifestations, complications, and outcomes of cardiovascular disease differ between women and men. The safety and efficacy of pharmacological reperfusion therapy in women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction are of particular interest. METHODS AND RESULTS We investigated outcomes in the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thromb...
متن کاملEnoxaparin and fibrinolysis: ExTRACTing prognosis from bleeding complications.
This editorial refers to ‘One-year outcomes after a strategy using enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of the ExTRACTTIMI 25 trial’, by D.A. Morrow et al., on page 2097 and ‘Relations between bleeding and outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial’,...
متن کاملEfficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1996 to May 2011. STUDY SELECTION Randomised and non-randomised studies comparing enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin during perc...
متن کاملThe safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients ineligible for reperfusion (TETAMI): a randomized trial.
OBJECTIVES The aims of the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin and Tirofiban Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Ineligible for Reperfusion (TETAMI) study were to demonstrate that enoxaparin was superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and that tirofiban was better than placebo in patie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The New England journal of medicine
دوره 354 14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006